“Occupy Wall Street” has been lauded by leftists as a peaceful movement that is looking for positive change in the world. However, this argument crumbles under the weight of actual facts.
Today, Breitbart TV released a video of “Occupy Denver” protesters mobbing a cop and pushing over his motorcycle. Reports of rapes and sexual assaults are piling up, but we cannot be sure of the actual number of these incidents because “Occupy” discourages protesters from telling police about crime. In fact, an “Occupy” rap sheet, which is being compiled by John Nolte, just topped 100 crimes!
In my opinion, there is no distinction between thugs and protesters on “Occupy Wall Street”. The movement is not peaceful by any measure, as members have taken to actually assaulting cops! Crime rates have skyrocketed in areas adjacent to the “Occupy” protests, and a motley crew of ex-cons, rapists, and thieves are actively preying on other “Occupy” members.
A legitimate political movement would be very different than “Occupy Wall Street”. A legitimate movement would come together every once in a while to hold protests instead of camping out in public parks and disturbing unfortunate neighbors. Such a movement would also be courteous to police officers, would acquire and obey permits, and would place great emphasis upon safety. Essentially, “Occupy” should model itself after the Tea Party, which is a very respectful, peaceful movement.
A major problem that “Occupy Wall Street” is confronting is legitimacy. In the eyes of most Americans, thousands of arrests and allegations of rape are not exactly a picturesque peaceful protest. The constant conflict at “Occupy” turns many people away from their cause and encourages an immediate dismissal of the ideas that have been presented at “Occupy Wall Street”. Another cause of this problem is the lack of focus by OWS. The protesters in the movement proclaim that “Occupy” is protesting against the “top 1%”, but any attempt to go beyond this broad summation into actual policy details pulls up some very murky results. Protester demands have included immediate and complete debt forgiveness for everyone and a “guaranteed living wage income regardless of employment”, and since no leaders have emerged in the movement, “Occupy” cannot dismiss these communist proposals.
“Occupy” claims to be a movement of the people, but I have yet to see any sort of central ideas (beyond the anti-1% rhetoric) to which every single protester agrees to and ascribes. In order for this movement to have any political relevance and impact, it must coalesce behind a central leader and come up with a simple, concrete set of demands. If this does not occur, “Occupy Wall Street” will remain a lawless mob.
Please follow the Project and share it with your friends by email, Facebook, or Twitter!











