Tag Archive: class warfare


President Obama says that without his leadership, the economy and the state of our country could be worse. However, it is an argument that won't fly.

President Obama’s State of the Union address Tuesday night was more of a preview of his new campaign strategy than an actual review of our current situation as a nation. Our growing deficit and our debt crisis, the two elephants in the room, were barely mentioned by President Obama, who preferred to spend his time bemoaning the success of wealthy Americans and pitting rich against poor. Fortunately, if these items are any indication of President Obama’s reelection strategy, Republicans should defeat him easily.

President Obama’s new strategy seems to depend on two central tactics: the first being to wage war against the rich in America and the second being to marginalize the problems that his administration has perpetrated. Pitting the rich against the poor and demonizing the successful in America will allow President Obama to essentially shift the blame for our current economic crisis onto the wealthiest Americans, who represent a minority in the United States. Castigating the rich can indeed win some voters, as some Americans are jealous of the wealth and prosperity of others. Fortunately, however, scapegoating the successful is not an effective strategy in the long term because it invites criticism from those on the right. Republican leaders have already decried President Obama numerous times for his divisiveness and for his pursuit of class warfare.

The more dangerous campaign strategy of the president is one that diminishes the real magnitude of the problems to which he has greatly contributed. Our national debt has increased by several trillion dollars since President Obama’s election back in 2009, and things are getting worse by the day. The United States debt currently sits at an alarmingly high $15.2 trillion, and Obama’s attempts to control spending have been quite literally non-existent. In fact, Mr. Obama has been more dedicated to increasing spending over his first term than he has been dedicated to decreasing it, as evidenced by Obamacare and the infamously wasteful stimulus programs that he championed. The economy continues to be driven into a ditch as disappointed, dispirited Americans continue to leave the workforce in droves and artificially suppress the unemployment rate, and the wanton waste of taxpayer dollars on government-funded messes like Solyndra shows an utter lack of stewardship of the hard-earned money of Americans by the Obama administration. All of these issues present major shortfalls for Obama’s reelection campaign, so the president’s new strategy is to simply minimize these topics. For example, the president has been attempting to diminish his failure at managing the American economy by saying that things could have been worse. However, be assured that whomever the Republican Party nominates to face the president this year will definitely focus on these topics and will make the president account for his failures. It is up to voters to listen to the truth and to realize that President Obama’s shortcomings far outweigh any of his supposed virtues.

The “Occupy Wall Street” movement has been much lauded by President Obama as an expression of the “frustration of the American people”. However, the entire movement is constructed around a class warfare agenda that does not solve the root of our current economic woes and that is counterproductive to an efficient, innovative society.

Bill Gates, billionaire and founder of Microsoft

Many protesters don’t even realize the fact that their calls for the downfall of corporate America are a stark contrast to their personal indulgence in the very same corporate environment that they are protesting. The irony of this was made clear by the deeply saddening death of Steve Jobs this week and its impact on Manhattan protesters, many of whom have been organizing their occupation using iPhones and iPads. “[Other billionaires] had a less positive impact on society than Jobs,” reasoned Thorin Caristo, one of the protest’s leading Internet organizers. He added that many protesters viewed Jobs as “a leader” and “a pioneer” who “made it easier for humans to communicate”. But if Jobs is held in esteem for his positive impact on society, what separates him from other billionaires? Bill Gates, the billionaire founder of Microsoft Corporation, lost his position as the wealthiest man in the world because of his massive contributions to philanthropic efforts. In fact, estimates by the wealth research firm Wealth-X show that had Gates not given away billions to charities and foundations, he would be worth $88 billion. Today, however, Bill Gates’ net worth is approximately $49 billion, and the man plans to give away even more of his massive fortune. Is he an evil man?

It is also important to note that the individuals and families belonging in the top 1% wealth category have usually made their fortunes from the creation of businesses, companies, and ideas. These businesses hire workers and innovate new products and technologies, improving the livelihoods of millions of people around the globe. The oil and gas giant Exxon-Mobile Corporation, a common target of anti-business rhetoric, employs over 80,000 people, and according to the employment website Glassdoor, an engineer for the company earns an average salary of about $95,000, which by most measures is an above average paycheck.

Activist and vehement anti-capitalist filmmaker Michael Moore

Given the remarkable contributions of the top 1% of income earners in America, I have concluded that the only possible reasons for discontent among Wall Street protesters are ignorance or jealousy: ignorance of the importance of the wealthy in the lives of the poor and the middle class and jealousy of the success of the wealthy. Many protesters want to empower the government to punish the success of thousands of wealthy Americans, who have done immeasurable good for the struggling economy. It is obvious that tax increases and calls for the wealthy to pay “their fair share” will do little to bring business back to the United States and improve the economy. Tax increases won’t even make a dent in our deficit, as whatever the government demands in additional taxes will be diminished and reversed by the businessmen and women that will flee the US economy in droves to move their investments and finances overseas. But even though tax increases are not even practical, they are called for by protesters anyway because, in their eyes, tax increases are a means to deliver justice to the rich for their profits.

I believe that the entire anti-Wall Street movement will die away fairly quickly, as the concepts upon which it is based are inherently flawed both in theory and in fact. The reality is that class warfare will only accelerate America’s economic and sociopolitical decline, and it is the responsibility of people across the United States to understand the fundamental importance of the wealthy in the overall economy.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 34 other followers