Tag Archive: freedom


Have we forgotten?

I was only 4 years old on September 11th, 2001, but I still remember that fateful day as if it was yesterday. Hearing noises down the hall, I woke up and walked into the living room, where my parents’ faces, pale from shock, stared blankly at the television set. I remember asking my dad what was going on, and his usually powerful voice was softened by pain. “Two planes just flew into the World Trade Center,” he said. Silence ensued, and we watched in horror as the magnificent towers collapsed, entombing thousands of helpless souls. Days after the attack, Congress unanimously supported military action against the Islamic terrorists behind the ruthless slaughter of American citizens.

Today, I can’t help but wonder if I am one of the only people who remembers the death and destruction of that day. Government leaders who wholeheartedly supported military action against the terrorists ten years ago don’t anymore. The wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, according to some, are only over oil, not over the elimination of those responsible for 9/11. It’s almost as if the thousands of deaths that September morning have been erased from the memories of the American people. It’s like no one really understands that Islamic terrorists want to kill us.

Clearly, Americans are taking their freedom for granted. Many Americans believe that freedom is a right, something that must be and always has been guaranteed for us. But this could not be further from the truth. Freedom is not a right, but a privilege earned by blood, sweat, tears, and desire. When thousands of lives vanished on September 11th, freedom began to slip from our fingers, and we suddenly realized how important it truly was to keep that freedom. We had fires in our bellies; a collective desire to let al-Qaeda know that America is the land of the free and the home of the brave.

What has happened to us?

Gotta love England.

With America’s support of the Libyan freedom fighters diminishing rapidly, David Cameron, the prime minister of England, is taking an increasing role in the battle for the freedom of Libya. Today, the Daily Telegraph reported that Cameron authorized the deployment of several Apache attack helicopters, which will help give the Libyan forces present there a tactical advantage. Mr. Cameron’s actions mark yet another British contribution toward the Libyan cause. While America’s limited deployments are already being pulled from Libya, England is determined to end this conflict and help the Libyans win their freedom. A joint statement from Cameron and US President Obama states, “We will stand with those who want to bring light into dark, support those who seek freedom in place of repression, aid those laying the building blocks of democracy.”

If this is the case, then why is Cameron the only one sending attack helicopters to Libya? While Cameron backs up his detestation of the Libyan regime with military force, President Obama “condemns” the actions of Gaddafi but does nothing. Too bad Cameron was born in England, because today, I wish he was my president.

British attack helicopters to be deployed
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/libya/8531704/British-attack-helicopters-to-Libya.html

My take on the Libyan conflict

The United States is the light of freedom in the world. From the Declaration of Independence on July 4th, 1776 that declared our thirteen colonies separate from England, to World War II, where the US and her allies fought back the Nazi menace, we have been and will always be a beacon of freedom for all nations.

Despite this, our President is stepping around the Libyan conflict like it’s a minefield. Weeks after the conflict began, despite Obama’s “demands” for Qaddafi to stop slaughtering his people, Qaddafi didn’t listen. He did not step down. He did not obey our president’s diplomatic request. No, the madman continued to slaughter his own civilians to stay in power, and Obama waited…and waited…and waited…
As rebel forces are about to be routed at the major rebel stronghold of Benghazi in week five of the protests there, someone comes in to help. But it’s not Obama. It’s the French and British who intervene, rescuing the rebel forces from extermination, as US forces finally receive the word to begin cruise missile strikes to pave the way towards a no-fly zone (which incidentally, was championed by the French). Obama’s administration has been indicating that they will withdraw most, if not all, combat assets from the area and leave the heavy lifting to NATO, which will have great difficulty helping the Libyan people without US help.
It has taken about four weeks for the US to join the fight against Qaddafi’s ruthless slaughter of his own people. From the moment we joined, Obama wanted out. Why is he so afraid to fight for the values of freedom that America has stood for during her entire existence?
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 52 other followers